Archives for category: Art teaching

Having completed the confirmation stage and awaiting feedback I have had time to potter into the etching studio at NUCA for a couple of occasions. This week I did print a proof of the first stage.

The etchings were liked during the show I had at NUCA last month so I decided to make another as a self portrait. This is based on a photo I made for the Sainsbury Centre for the Visual Arts show about the artist’s studio. I find the transferring of an image to the plate difficult for some reason. This one is based on a photo which has been inverted and then monochromed to give me a chance. This has been dipped twice so far and then re-grounded for further working.

I have found some nice etchings by Lucien Freud who uses etching as a drawing medium and just dips it once. This appeals.

The blog has been moribund as I have been preoccupied with the confirmation process at NUCA. I have got through this and I am now officially ‘writing up’. As I approached the confirmation meeting I re-read the 16,000 words that I had produced and realised that it wasn’t quite what I had meant, somehow. It was ever so slightly off my point, rather too much about the artist-teacher. This is pretty well-covered ground and it has been a problem in the research to deal with this, to find an angle on it.

During the meeting I was asked where the practice was in the research and where the researcher had disappeared to. It was all about the teacher bit and the relationship between the artist-teacher and the pupil’s progress. The problem is how do you access the impact of having a teacher make their own work in the classroom through the pupil’s progress. It isn’t very apparent necessarily. It might be more obvious in the sort of work that we do and, I think, some of the brio with which we do it.

The original inspiration for the research had been in looking at the sort of examplars that I made in the classroom to show the pupils what I meant or to show them a particular technique or idea. I have long thought that showing them ‘one I prepared earlier’ was borderline useless as it takes a skilled eye to be able to unpick how an image was actually made. It was more useful to see a piece of work being made before your very eyes and the only way to do that was to actually make work in front of the pupils. Doing this I think about how I learnt how to do something, it made my own learning more apparent to myself and better able to communicate this and the process helped me to anticipate the tricky bits. So, it has been a long standing habit to make work in front of and alongside the pupils. This sort of work though, made as it is with cheapish gouache on sugar paper or 1.99 watercolours on cartridge paper, I didn’t consider to be ‘my work’. I had my own paintings and so on and then I had this utilitarian work I made in class. I didn’t value it as part of my art practice but then again, I nearly always finished the work and I didn’t throw it away either. So I valued it in some way.

I never threw it away because I remember an art teacher showing us how to throw a pot and then knocking it over when he had done and we were shocked and disturbed that he did this. I was about twelve. He said he had lots of pots at home but it still seemed shocking to be able to make something like that but not value the outcome. So I don’t throw them away and I tend to finish them. I give them away sometimes, to adults, not pupils. I let the frost destroy the pots in the garden and I keep the 45 or so self-portraits in the manner of Modigliani amongst the drifts of work in the art room.

So the original interest in the research was, what happens if you take this under valued part of art making, this stream of utilitarian things made to show someone, and make that the art practice. Could it be considered part of an art practice? For a lot of art teachers it is the only art practice they have got. Should we value it more? What is different about making an art work in order to show someone how to do something or to show them an idea? What do they exemplify? Are you making examples for yourself and what might that mean?

We discussed this in the confirmation meeting and we agreed that was probably more interesting than what I had actually written. The nice thing about it is that it puts the practice back into it and stops me having to try to show that my painting a picture two years ago may, or may not, have impacted on a thirteen year old in some ill-defined way.

I have also had a show at NUCA of this sort of work and I will post pictures of this soon. What cam out of this was that everyone seemed to quite like the etchings for their awkwardness and intensity as much as anything. So I am writing this as a plate steeps. One of the 10 x 8 plates that I had before Christmas and that got subsumed in 16,000 academic words. It is based on a photo of myself sitting in the art room as studio that I made for the Artist and their Studio show at SCVA. It is an attempt to use a photo as a basis for a print.

Before the Christmas break I went to the Suffolk Head of Art Conference down at Belstead House in Ipswich. Jevan Watkins Jones talked about his work as artist in residence at Northgate High School in Ipswich which I found particularly affecting. At the back of the room was a massive drawing by Jevan of life at the school, based on drawings made by the children. This was a maquette for a large ceramic mural made for the school as part of the ‘legacy’ of the project. Because of an art and science link the children and dinner ladies were drawn with X-ray additions of anatomy which gave it all a slightly Satresque edge.

Jevan had left his sketchbooks out and it was a privilege to be able to look through them. Jevan spoke about his meditative time looking out of the window and drawing the children as they came to school. I should have taken a shot of the vast drawing but I didn’t which was foolish as I can’t show you, or the children.

Anyway, if this project is about the artist teacher then it made me think about the other side of that, the artist side of that. How different is it to be an artist in a school rather than a teacher pretending to be an artist? What did Jevan do that I don’t? How different is the experience?

I know I have an archive of shots of bits of school like Jevan’s. Looking at a school as a place, with the signage and bits of pipe and switches all over. The schools I have worked in have always been a palimpsest of wiring and pipe ducts, great to photograph. That seemed to be significant; being able to see where you are as potentially strange. other. After the conference I did take a camera round again for a few more duct shots, as I realised I hadn’t done that for a while. Becoming habituated; a bad sign.

What a teacher doesn’t have is that time to sit and drift, meditate, draw what unfolds. The teacher has to act, be interrupted, intervene, decide, watch, surveil and so on.

But, inspired by the presentation and this vast drawing and the beautiful drawings I started a sketchbook and tried to draw the children going home with their bags and drawing at their desks and so on, in quiet moments. I kept it up for a week or so and I have added to it since Christmas with woolly hats and snowball fights.

And I tried to get the children in year seven to engage with a similar set of ideas. I was making things difficult for myself as I had the idea in my mind’s eye of what I had seen but no way to show the children because I hadn’t taken a picture. Did it matter? I told them that the project was a based on seeing the work of an artist.  Specifically it as based on a slide of the pupil drawings that Jevan based his mural drawing on. I set the children to thinking of the most interesting thing they had done at school that week and doing a little sketch which we then made into a big drawing with brush and poster. The poster is standing in for ink, really and the whole idea was for it to be quick and bold.

The next week we cut the big drawings out and I stapled them up as a temporary mural.

Temporary mural at GMS

Temporary mural at GMS